Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Acoma Energy, LLC et al v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Acoma Energy, LLC and Ivory Assets, LLC
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Triple C Minerals L L C v. X T O Energy Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Triple C Minerals LLC and Triple C Minerals L L C
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc., Anadarko Petroleum Corp and X T O Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Peter Brusamonti, et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 23-2912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER BRUSAMONTI and LISA BRUSAMONTI, husband and wife, on behalf themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
XTO ENERGY INC
Murray v. Exxon Mobile Corporation, et al.
as 4:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Michael Murray
Defendant:
Exxon Mobile Corporation and XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Northland Royalty Corp. v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Northland Royalty Corp.
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hystad Ceynar Minerals, LLC v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 23-8007
Petitioner:
Hystad Ceynar Minerals, LLC
Respondent:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Roger Salvatora, et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 23-8031
Respondent:
ROGER A. SALVATORA, SANDRA E. SALVATORA, D&M MARBURGER FAMILY ENTERPRISES LP and others
Petitioner:
XTO ENERGY INC
Sherman v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sherman
Defendant:
Daniel Davis and XTO Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hystad Ceynar Mineral, LLC v. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Hystad Ceynar Mineral, LLC
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
