Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Accomodations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MOHAMMED et al v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv22178
Defendant:
OGE DENIS, JR., ALLISON ROONEY, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
Y. M. and IMTAZ MOHAMMED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv07425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mullen et al v. Bryan et al
as 5:2018cv05232
Defendant:
Ken Osborne, Victoria Bruton and Hon. Beth Storey Bryan
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Mullen, Y. M., A. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregorio et al v. Khan et al
as 1:2015cv02867
Plaintiff:
Martha Gregorio , Jesus Santiago , J. M. and others
Defendant:
Akbar Khan and Nova Property Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Torres v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michele Y. M. H. Torres
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu , Alan Togami , Gregory Kinoshita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fatimah Muhammad v. William Spiller, Jr., et al
as 10-56509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FATIMAH MUHAMMAD, minor childrens, Guardian Ad Litem Y. M., Guardian Ad Litem N. M.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM SPILLER, Jr., STEFF PADILLA and H. ELIZABETH HARRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
