Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Smith v. YouTube, LLC
as 0:2024cv60441
Plaintiff:
Mr. Chris E Smith
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Libel, Assault, Slander
SELLERS v. YOUTUBE LLC
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
YOUTUBE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeal v. Calvin et al
as 4:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kimberly Newman, et al v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-16202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY CARLESTE NEWMAN, LISA CABRERA, CATHERINE JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC and YOUTUBE, LLC
Defendant:
ALPHABET, INC.
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Valmiki Ramani v. YouTube, LLC
as 23-16201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VALMIKI D. RAMANI
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, LLC
Robert Kennedy, Jr. v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-16141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware corporation and YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Kennedy, JR. v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03880
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Kennedy, JR.
Defendant:
Google LLC and YouTube LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Torbet v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05944
Plaintiff:
Hugo Torbet
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Google Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Google Inc and Youtube LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trump et al v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv08009
Plaintiff:
President Donald J. Trump, Kelly Victory, Austen Fletcher and others
Defendant:
YouTube LLC and Sundar Pichai
Interested Party:
Ted Kurt, United States of America, Twitter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
