Cases 71 - 80 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06173
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORDERO v. YRC, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH CORDERO
Defendant:
YRC, INC. , YRC WORLDWIDE INC. and CARLTON HORACE HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Better, et al v. YRC Worldwide, et al
as 16-600
Petitioner:
STAN BETTER and YRC INVESTORS GROUP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
YRC WORLDWIDE, INC., WILLIAM D. ZOLLARS, MICHAEL SMID and others
PRESTIA et al v. GOMEZ et al
as 2:2016cv01326
Plaintiff:
GARY PRESTIA and LAURIE PRESTIA
Defendant:
PEDRO GOMEZ, YRC INC., YRC FREIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. YRC Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01966
Plaintiff:
Antwone Jackson , Yolanda Jackson , Malikai Jackson and others
Defendant:
YRC Worldwide, Inc. , YRC, Inc. and James Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarix S.A. v. YRC Worldwide Inc. (Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv07328
Defendant:
C.A.L. Cargo Airlines Ltd., Fracht FWO, Inc., Fracht Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sarix S.A.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Patterson et al v. Cruz et al
as 1:2015cv09405
Petitioner:
Nancy Patterson and Frank Adinolfi
Respondent:
Francisco Cruz , YRC Worldwide Inc and YRC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarr v. USF Reddaway, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02243
Plaintiff:
William Tarr
Defendant:
Gerald Thomas Truelove, USF Reddaway, Inc. and YRC Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Village of Sauk Village v. Roadway Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09183
Plaintiff:
Village of Sauk Village
Defendant:
Roadway Express, Inc. , YRC Worldwide Inc , Arcadis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
