Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Ning Xianhua v. Oath Holdings, Inc., et al
as 22-15700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NING XIANHUA
Defendant / Appellee:
OATH HOLDINGS, INC., and as successor in interest to Yahoo! Inc., DBA Yahoo! Inc., ALTABA INC., and as successor in interest to Yahoo! Inc., FKA Yahoo! Inc., TERRY SEMEL and others
Roundtree v. Hartford Courant et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant:
Hartford Courant, Telemundonevainglaterra.com, Dailyadvent.com and others
Long v. Long et al
as 5:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Corporal James Plummer, Rita Kruger, Jacob Wayne Bellington and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jon Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Xianhua v. Oath Holdings, Inc. f/k/a/Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv06185
Defendant:
JERRY YANG, TERRY SEMEL, OATH HOLDINGS, INC., f/k/a YAHOO! INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NING XIANHUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Melton v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00152
Defendant:
Straight Talk, Best Buy, Marysville Waste Management and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abergel v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 1:2019cv06281
Plaintiff:
Isaac Mike Abergel
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agardi v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv05612
Plaintiff:
Julianna Agardi
Defendant:
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Global Hyatt Corporation and Yahoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. New York Hospital Cornell
as 17-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Perez
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Hospital Cornell, Dr. Emie, DARE, its officers and Board Members and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
