Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Zion Lutheran Church v. Velocity Claims, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Zion Lutheran Church
Defendant:
Velocity Claims, LLC, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Undisputed Consulting, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
THE MENDHAM METHODIST CHURCH et al v. MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv02347
Plaintiff:
THE MENDHAM METHODIST CHURCH and THE ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH LONG VALLEY
Defendant:
MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MORRIS COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRUST FUND REVIEW BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL, INC. , NANCY WILT, WILLIAM BAILEY and others
Counter_claimant:
WILLIAM BAILEY AS TRUSTEE OF THE BLANCHE OPPERMAN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST FUND DATED 6/15/2004 , JOHN F. STONEBERG , WILLIAM BAILEY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF BLANCE OPPERMAN and others
Counter_defendant:
FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sayyed v. Six Churches et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Muamar A. Sayyed
Defendant:
Six Churches, Living Word Lutheran Church, Zion Lutheran Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Zion Lutheran School et al
as 3:2012cv01256
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas and AGT
Defendant:
Zion Lutheran School, David Kniepkamp, Zion Lutheran Church and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas v. Zion Lutheran School
as 4:2012cv02243
Plaintiff:
Albert D. Thomas and AGT
Defendant:
Zion Lutheran School, David Kniepkamp, Zion Lutheran Church and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
