Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Young v. SGT Price et al
as 8:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Defendant:
SGT Price and Zafar A. Ansari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Spinosa v. FWVape Bros, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kevin Spinosa
Defendant:
FWVape Bros, LLC, Waleed Zafar and Fahad Zafar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gelasio v. ZAFAR et al
as 3:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gelasio
Defendant:
HARIS BIN ZAFAR and PROJECT ETHER LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Zafar Iqbal v. BPOA PA State Board of Medicine, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendant:
BPOA PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, CHIEF DONALD K. COKUS, North Fayette Township Police Department, City of Pittsburgh, CURAHEALTH PITTSBURGH LLC and others
Sheikh v. Chaudry et al
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Zafar Sheikh
Defendant:
Bashir Chaudry, Bushra Naseer, Ambreen Qadir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lewis v. Uzma Zafar, MD, P.C.
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marsadie Lewis
Defendant:
Uzma Zafar, MD, P.C., a Nevada professional corporation, dba Axis Psychiatry and Uzma Zafar, MD, P.C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zafar v. Garland
as 23-6312
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD BILAL ZAFAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
IQBAL v. BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE et al
as 2:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
ZAFAR IQBAL
Defendant:
BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, DONALD J. COKUS, JR., CURAHEALTH PITTSBURGH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
