Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group, Jack Ma, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deborah Russell v. County of Sanilac, et al
as 15-2416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH K RUSSELL, Grandparent of RQ, JQ, and MQ, minors
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANILAC, SANILAC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SANILAC DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Russell et al v. Sanilac, County of et al
as 2:2014cv13134
Plaintiff:
Deborah K Russell, RQ, JQ and others
Defendant:
Sanilac, County of, Sanilac Department of Human Services, Sanilac Department of Child Protective Services and others
Javier Luis v. Joseph Zang, et al
as 14-3601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVIER LUIS
Defendant:
JOSEPH ZANG, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
AWARENESS TECHNOLOGIES
Luis v. Zang et al
as 1:2012cv00629
Defendant:
Awareness Technologies, Inc., Mike Osborne, Peter Fuhrman and others
Petitioner:
Hill Ward Henderson, Scott J Stitt, James E Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Luis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Paul O'Grady, et al v. City of Ballwin, et al
as 12-2785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul O'Grady, Robyn Herr, D.H., by next friend Lisa Gann and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Ballwin, Steve Morrison, Curt Saitta and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
