Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hsu v. Zeisler et al
as 3:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Hsu
Defendant:
Aaron M. Zeisler, Brian A. Burns and Winslow Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Becton v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Becton and Terrance D. Becton
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Company Inc., Leader Express LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ZEISLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15347
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ZEISLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joe Roberts v. Tim Thrasher, et al
as 21-35183
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, 5, Nurse, Monroe Correctional Complex, KEVIN DAHLBY, WSP Corrections Officer, HAILEE JIMINEZ, Psych Associate, Monroe Correctional Complex and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE J.W. ROBERTS
Zeisler et al v. Hickey et al
as 3:2020cv03016
Plaintiff:
Brandon Zeisler and Kendall Zeisler
Defendant:
David Hickey and Farmers National Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edgmand v Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Bill James Coleman, Patrica Zeisler and Scott Russell
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jay Edgmand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carranza v. Pool et al
as 3:2020cv03087
Plaintiff:
Eric Carranza
Defendant:
Butch Pool and Aaron Zeisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2019cv01584
Defendant:
Jewitt, Santos Deleon, Grady and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 3:2019cv05183
Defendant:
Christopher C Bowman, Ambrose, J Uglick and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2018cv05196
Defendant:
Robert Herzog, Jason McCollum, Walt End and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
