Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Leonidas Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONIDAS R. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN ZICKERFOOSE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Leonidas R. Fields
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Zickerfoose, United States Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Troiano v. Zickerfoose
as 3:2014cv01622
Petitioner:
James Troiano
Respondent:
Donna Zickerfoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Douglas v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2014cv00293
Petitioner:
Paul Ryan Douglas
Respondent:
United States Of America and Zickerfoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sargent v. Coakley et al
as 4:2013cv01702
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Sargent
Defendant:
J. Coakley, Federal Satellite Low Elkton, D. Zickerfoose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Zickerfoose et al
as 1:2011cv00484
Petitioner:
Manuel Domingo Santana
Respondent:
Donna Zickerfoose, Whitenour, A. Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reeves v. F.C.I. Fort Dix et al
as 1:2010cv04171
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant:
F.C.I. FORT DIX, Zickerfoose, FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. F.C.I. Fort Dix et al
as 1:2010cv02765
Defendant:
Mr. Batiste, F.C.I. Fort Dix, Captain Fitzgerald and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarran v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00254
Petitioner:
Jesus Albarran
Respondent:
United States of America and Donna Zickerfoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Zickerfoose et al
as 3:2008cv01555
Petitioner:
Janice Lynn Clark
Respondent:
Donna Zickerfoose and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
