Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Mazen Agha, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 24-1749
Plaintiff:
MAZEN HASAN AGHA, MICHAEL CRISSMAN, KEN ZUREK and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Agha v. Uber Technologies lnc
as 1:2023cv17182
Plaintiff:
Mazen Hasan Agha, Michael Crissman, Ken Zurek and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies lnc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gosier v. Oneida County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Gosier
Defendant:
Oneida County Correctional Facility, Robert M. Maciol and Lt. Lisa Zurek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linder v. Maciol et al
as 9:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Willie Linder, Jr. and Willie Linder
Defendant:
Robert Maciol, Lisa Zurek and Derrick O'Meara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linder v. Oneida County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Willie Linder, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County Correctional Facility and Lisa Zurek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Zurek et al
as 9:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Amir Bowman
Defendant:
Oneida County Correctional Facility, Lisa Zurek and James Paternaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Zurek et al
as 9:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Marshall D. Jackson
Defendant:
Chief Zurek, Lt. Campbell and Cpt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #620214 v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith #620214
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 2:2023cv11250
Plaintiff:
Javone Smith
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew R. Book, Darin Southworth and others
Zurek v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11101
Plaintiff:
Jack Zurek
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
