Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Anthony Miller
MILLER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00984
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ANTHONY MILLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Miller v. The County of Monroe
as 6:2023cv06649
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller
Defendant:
The County of Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. BOSTIC NURSING CENTER
as 5:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
TRACY ANTHONY MILLER
Defendant:
BOSTIC NURSING CENTER, COLLETTE LEWIS, JENNA BRANTLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12435
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miller v. Freeman et al
as 2:2023cv11486
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Eric Freeman and Burton, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitts et al v. Newberry et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Colby Blake Fitts and Kayla Nicole Fitts
Defendant:
Don Newberry, Amy Strahan, Tiffany McDaniels Acting Head Teller doing business as Madison County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
