Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Gonzalez
as 4:2009cv01415
Plaintiff: Alego Casteneda Gonzalez, The Estate of Alego Castaneda Gonzalez, JUAN M. GONZALEZ INDIVIDUALY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF ALEJO CASTANEDA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant: The City Of Houston, R E Briggs and K C Echols
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type: Civil Rights None
Sarah Babcock v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35445
Plaintiff - Appellant: SARAH BABCOCK, AKA John Babcock
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, RUBEN CEDENO, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT and others
Cheryl Faylor v. Michael Szupper, et al
as 09-2224
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHERYL FAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL SZUPPER, Individually and as Relocation Specialist United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), WESTMORELAND CTY, HOME BUILD HOPE, A Sevice of Adelphoi, USA and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOHN TOLBERT, Individually and as Field Office Director, HUD
Shanklin v. USA, et al
as 08-50674
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, JOHN DOE #1, Agent Carter's Supervisor and others
Agnes Suever, et al v. Kathleen Connell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-15884
Plaintiff - Appellant: AGNES SUEVER, deceased, MADONNA SUEVER, STEVE TUCKER and others
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN CONNELL, in her individualy capacity, RICHARD CHIVARO, in his individual and official capacity, GEORGE DELEON, in his individual and official capacity and others
George Fossyl, et al v. Thomas Watson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-4546
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE DAVID FOSSYL, Individualy and as Administrator of the Estate of Cheryl Fossyl, TONIA HARRIS and MARTIN FOSSYL
Defendant: THOMAS AUBREY WATSON, et al.
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL R. MILLIGAN
George Fossyl, et al v. Thomas Watson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-4548
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE DAVID FOSSYL, Individualy and as Administrator of the Estate of Cheryl Fossyl, TONIA HARRIS and MARTIN FOSSYL
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS AUBREY WATSON
Defendant: MICHAEL R. MILLIGAN, et al.
Clark, et al v. Boscher, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-2473
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR L. CLARK, individually, RITA M. CLARK, individually, RAYMOND A. CLARK, Trustee of the E. Mt. Rd. Nominee Trust, and as Trustee of the Arthur L. Clark Family Trust and as Trustee of the Clark Sons Realty Trust and others
Defendant - Appellee: LYNN BOSCHER, individually and as member of the Westfield Planning Board during 2003, PHILIP MCEWAN, individually and as member of the Westfield Planning Board during 2003, KEVIN BOWLER, individually and as member of the Westfield Planning Board during 2003 and others
S.S. v. Eastern KY Univ, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-6165
Plaintiff - Appellant: S.S., a minor, by and through his Parents and Next of Friends, James and Carol Stutts
Defendant - Appellee: EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY, ELLEN RINI, Individualy and in Her Official Capacity as School Psychologist of The Model Laboratory Middle School of Eastern Kentucky University and JACQUELINE VANCE, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Director of The Model Laboratory Middle School of Eastern Kentucky University
City of Sioux City, Iowa v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv01723
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company ,individualy and doing business as ARCO products Company (f/k/a Arco Petroleum Co.), and also known as ARCO, BP Amoco Chemical Co., Chevron Texaco Corp. ,individualy and formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation (d/b/a Chevron Products Company, d/b/a Chevron Chemical Company) and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: City of Sioux City, Iowa, Galva City of, Ida Grove City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?