Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Ortiz-Montero v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
NESTOR A. ORTIZ-MONTERO
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
United States of America v. Ortiz
as 24-516
Defendant:
JOSE ORTIZ and Grillo
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Calhoun et al v. Kane et al
as 2:2024cv10184
Plaintiff:
Terance Calhoun, Legal Conservator Octavia Monrie, Theodore Goodman and others
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Robert Kane, Jose Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Candelario v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Clemente Candelario
Defendant:
Jose Ortiz and Vianca Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24395
Plaintiff:
JOSE ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24015
Plaintiff:
JOSE ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20332
Plaintiff:
JOSE ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Midence v. MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02425
Plaintiff:
Marlon Andres Castillo Midence
Defendant:
MJ Framing & Drywall, LLC, Miguel Ortiz, Jose Ortiz and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
