Cases 31 - 40 of 65
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LACKEY and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACKEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01463
Plaintiff:
KARALYN LACKEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lackey v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2017cv01787
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESSANDRO, DSCS, ADAM SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LACKEY, SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKHART v. LACKEY et al
as 2:2017cv00906
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURKHART
Defendant:
MS. LACKEY, ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULMERICH BELLS, LLC v. JEFFERS HANDBELL SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
SCHULMERICH BELLS, LLC
Defendant:
JEFFERS HANDBELL SUPPLY, INC. and SHAWN L. LACKEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LACKEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04557
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LACKEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
