Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schmuker v. Deutchman et al
as 2:2022cv10889
Plaintiff:
Amber Schmuker
Defendant:
Cara Deutchman, Sun Yoon Yang, Iesha Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nash v. Zamora et al
as 5:2022cv10281
Plaintiff:
Brent James Nash
Defendant:
Meg Zamora, Karen Branch, Candace Comer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash #406338 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brent Nash #406338
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Dana Nessel, Meg Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mounts et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mounts, Larry Epling, Mabel Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Oshinowo v. ASM Holdings LLC
as 2:2020cv11393
Defendant:
ASM Holdings LLC, Davena Knight, Rebecca Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Olusegun Oshinowo, Golden Castle LLC, Somewhere Out There LLC and others
Nicholson v. Adams et al
as 2:2019cv13677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nicholson
Defendant:
Stephine M. Adams, Rebecca Smith and Karen Branch
smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv10771
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Inc., Heidi Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
