Cases 1 - 10 of 50
(HC) Taylor v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Robert Taylor
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
James Lewis Apodaca
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr. v. Stephen Smith
as 2:2023cv09999
Petitioner:
Ruben Adrian Cortes, Jr
Respondent:
Acting Warden Stephen Smith and Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards III v. Burgos et al
as 1:2023cv00911
Defendant:
Jacklyn A. Reaviles, PFC Daniel Burgos, Jacklyn A. Shipley and others
Plaintiff:
George Firman Richards III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harness-Simmons v. Lafayette County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dillon W Harness-Simmons
Defendant:
Lafayette County Jail, Stephen Smith and Gabe Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgar Eduardo Martinez v. Stephen Smith
as 8:2023cv01138
Petitioner:
Edgar E. Martinez
Respondent:
Smith Stephen and Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Aguirre v. Smith
as 2:2023cv00930
Petitioner:
Andrew Aguirre
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dempsey v. Smith
as 3:2023cv02182
Petitioner:
Patrick Dugan Dempsey
Defendant:
Warden Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00726
Plaintiff:
Robert Gonzales
Defendant:
Peoria, City of, Unknown Parties, Stephen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
