Cases 11 - 20 of 35
BOOZER v. PEACE et al
as 3:2019cv00201
Defendant:
BARRY R. SMITH, LISA R. PEACE and MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR. and RICHARD LONEY BOOZER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Charles Jones v. Peggy Baughman
as 19-3456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN and MUHAMMAD NAJI
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
AINA V. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CRNP RICHARD CLARK, CRNP PATRICK NAGLE, PA-C CASEY THORNLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE YANICK AINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SASSE v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00130
Defendant:
PATRICK NAGLE, REBECCA REIFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN SASSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Anthony Williams v. Muhammad Naji, et al
as 19-2394
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Director, Bureau of Health Care Services, JANET PEARSON, CHCA, PATRICK NAGLE, PA and others
Defendant:
MARGRET BARNES, C.R.N.P., DORINA VARNER, C.R.N.P., JANET PEARSON, C.R.N.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Wayne Prater v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 19-1732
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH JURY, Nurse at SCI Houtzdale, RICHARD, MAINES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE PRATER
BOOZER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant:
THERESE CANTOLINA, BARRY A. SMITH, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WEAVER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00029
Defendant:
MD MUHAMMAD NAJI and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS LLC
Plaintiff:
JASON WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
