Cases 21 - 30 of 826,250
Evans-Panton v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv01996
Plaintiff:
Annika Evans-Panton
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SU v. Wyncote Wellness, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01975
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
Wyncote Wellness, LLC and DOMINQUE CONNER
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. INDEPENDENT BALANCING COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT BALANCING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Gantt v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Juanita Gantt
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lancashire Syndicate at Lloyds of London v. Interstate Drop Yard, LLC
as 2:2024cv02301
Plaintiff:
Lancashire Syndicate at Lloyds of London
Defendant:
Interstate Drop Yard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kennedy v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
as 6:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Cellular South Inc
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024bk20552
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk41960
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
