Death Penalty Cases matching "S"
Cases 1 - 10 of 457
Whatley v. Dunn
as 1:2019cv00938
Respondent: Jefferson S. Dunn
Petitioner: Donald Dwayne Whatley
Nunnery v. Gittere et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00618
Petitioner: Eugene Nunnery
Respondent: Warden William Gittere, Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv02496
Petitioner: Craig Alan Wall, Sr.
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv02307
Defendant: Warden Timothy Shoop
Plaintiff: Clarence Fry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obermiller v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv02193
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Petitioner: Denny Obermiller
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shockley v. Crews We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02520
Petitioner: Lance Shockley
Respondent: Travis Crews
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Shoop
as 5:2019cv02063
Petitioner: Phillip L. Jones
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowles v. Inch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00936
Respondent: Attorney General Ashley Moody, Secretary Mark S. Inch
Petitioner: Gary Ray Bowles
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Pickens v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv00558
Petitioner: Mark Pickens
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronk v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00346
Plaintiff: Timothy Ronk
Defendant: Jim Hood, Commissioner Pelicia Hall
Interested Party: Terryl Rushing
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?