Cases 31 - 40 of 826,630
Doe v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2024cv02872
Plaintiff:
John CJ Doe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Morel v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Melody B. Morel
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Brimley et al v. Patterson Warehouses, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02307
Plaintiff:
Brittany Brimley and Travis Faison
Defendant:
Patterson Warehouses, Inc.
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heard v. County of San Diego, State of California
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Dejon Heard
Defendant:
County of San Diego, State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wulff v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Stacy Melissa Wulff
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
(SS)Verdugo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Herlinda Guadalupe Verdugo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
