Cases 91 - 100 of 827,535
Colleran v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02683
Plaintiff:
Jason Colleran
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bove, Jr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02679
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bove, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Richard Gamblin
as 24-2034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Blane Gamblin
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
United States v. Richard Gamblin
as 24-2035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Blane Gamblin
Meenan et al v. McDaniel Group Enterprises Inc et al
as 0:2024cv60848
Plaintiff:
Fergal Joseph Meenan and Danny Rodriguez
Defendant:
McDaniel Group Enterprises Inc, Aaron McDaniel, Carmelita McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Copeland v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Dina Copeland
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Celltrion, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Celltrion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
