Cases 101 - 110 of 826,426
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Contreras et al v. West Gulf Maritime Association et al
as 4:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alfonso Contreras, Mr. Alberto Bahena, Jr., Ms. Vianey Karina Balderas and others
Defendant:
West Gulf Maritime Association and Cooper/Ports America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Montcrief v. Peripheral Vascular
as 24-50176
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Montcrief, Realtor, Roberta A. Martinez, Realtor and Alicia Burnett, Realtor
Defendant:
Peripheral Vascular Associates, P.A.
Yanping Chen v. FBI, et al
as 24-5050
Plaintiff:
Yanping Chen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Defense and others
Appellant:
Catherine Herridge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk41110
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dawkins v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Elkino Dawkins, Sr
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Becerra #198128 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Becerra
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. RH
as 3:2024cv02774
Plaintiff:
Kaela Washington
Defendant:
RH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
