Cases 111 - 120 of 827,218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Byron-Corbin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Denise Louise Byron Corbin and Denise Louise Byron-Corbin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Villere v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Shana Villere
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Staci Jones
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wilhelm v. Community Memorial Hospital Association
as 0:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Beth Wilhelm
Defendant:
Community Memorial Hospital Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Sanderson v. Myrdal
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Janne Myrdal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02547
Plaintiff:
Valda Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02548
Plaintiff:
Catherine Neel
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reddick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reddick
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhoads v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02550
Plaintiff:
Richard Rhoads
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
