Cases 11 - 20 of 826,722
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC et al v. Ropka
as 2:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC, Intact Services USA LLC and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sandra Ropka
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McCardle v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65538
Plaintiff:
Veronica S. McCardle
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blair v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 1:2024sf65545
Plaintiff:
Dominick Blair
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCR Oil Tools v. TRAN
as 24-60230
Petitioner:
MCR Oil Tools, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Pete Buttigieg, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Correa E Silva, et al v. Garland
as 24-1471
Petitioner:
RICARDO CORREA E SILVA, AMANDA FORTES DA SILVA CORREA, A. F. D. S. C. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
