Social Security Cases filed in Missouri matching "s. v."
Cases 1 - 10 of 862
Lane v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03109
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: John Coleman Lane
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Lane v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00200
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: John Coleman Lane
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Barber v. Saul
as 4:2019cv02701
Plaintiff: Kimberly S Barber, Kimberly S. Barber
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Carroll v. Saul
as 5:2019cv06098
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Carroll
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Tipton v. Saul
as 6:2019cv03241
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Tipton
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turnbo v. Saul
as 3:2019cv05046
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Nicole Turnbo
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Williams, Sr. v. Saul
as 4:2019cv01787
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Derrie S. Williams, Sr.
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Washington v Saul
as 2:2019cv00048
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Myeisha S Washington, Myeisha S. Washington
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
French v. Saul
as 4:2019cv01706
Plaintiff: Matthew S. French, Sr.
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Amber R. Calder v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner
as 6:2019cv03215
Plaintiff: Amber R Calder
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?