Cases 51 - 60 of 375,237
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delacruz v. Ricci et al
as 9:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Delacruz
Defendant:
C.O. Brendan Ricci, C.O. Todd Shoemaker, C.O. Dustin Vanhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luiz et al v. Arrington et al
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Denice Shala Joy Luiz and Kameron Biondello
Defendant:
Lisa Arrington, Brenda Blackburn, Nicole Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Starnes v. Ward et al
as 6:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wright Starnes
Defendant:
Paul Ward, Seth Mills, Greenville County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Taylor v. Bullard et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Sebastian Bullard and Kenneth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Miller
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Judge Barry Tidwell and Melissa Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Estevan Deases
Defendant:
Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Christopher L Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
