Cases 91 - 100 of 279
Tambil v. Ford
as 1:2015cv01490
Plaintiff:
Salih Tambil
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Tadeo Ayala v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv01492
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos Tadeo Ayala
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
McBride v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2015cv04110
Plaintiff:
William Michael McBride
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc and Professional Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Oravis et al v. United States of America, Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
John Oravis and Hector Perez
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of Personnel Management and Keypoint Government Solutions
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Williams v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
Donnie Williams
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Raleigh Anderson v. United States of America
as 15-1825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEIGH ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and GEORGE MCCONNELL
Sturdivant v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
David Sturdivant
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
James et al v. U.S. Government
as 8:2015cv00709
Plaintiff:
Fleming James , Rice Taren and J.F.
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8715
Will I Am El v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Fola M. Will I Am El
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Landers v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 2:2015cv01410
Plaintiff:
Charles Landers
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Poca Blending, LLC , Freedom Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
