Cases 21 - 30 of 94,758
Moore v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Moore, Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yuste v. State of Montana
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Elias Yuste
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02878
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent:
US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey #361996 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Leon Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grewal #338078 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Petitioner:
Avtar Singh Grewal
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Riley v. Prudhle
as 2:2024cv01363
Petitioner:
Rico Lyntice Riley
Respondent:
Prudhle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eberhardt v. McMahill et al
as 2:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
Randy Eberhardt
Respondent:
Kevin McMahill and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
