Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 37,650
Fly v. Woodcock et al
as 6:2024cv03151
Plaintiff: Kenneth Fly
Defendant: Deputy Jacob Woodcock and Christian County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Hartmann et al
as 4:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant: Klaus Hartmann, Brittani E. Lewit, Kristi Egger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff: Kenneth W Clark
Defendant: David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Hindson v. DataX, LTD et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff: Tomika Hindson
Defendant: DataX, LTD and LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hindson v. General Motors LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Tomika Hindson
Defendant: General Motors LLC, LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc. and OnStar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Metro Transit Police Dept et al
as 0:2024cv01791
Plaintiff: Joshua Harris
Defendant: Metro Transit Police Dept, Nelson and Vang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01793
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?