Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 49,241
Elbert Gaynor v. Calvin Ball
as 24-1430
Plaintiff: ELBERT GAYNOR
Defendant: CALVIN BALL, JACOB DAY and WES MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1432
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson v. Cyber Space et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff: Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant: Cyber Space, Digital Communication, Fiber Internet MetroNet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1420
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Horne v. Monahan's Pub
as 1:2024cv01387
Plaintiff: Gregory Horne
Defendant: Monahan's Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Darrell Hubbard
Defendant: Goldsboro Police Department, Alvino Daniels, Eric Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff: RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant: EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?