Cases 71 - 80 of 12,398
Tunison v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
Bruce Tunison
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yates v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Melissa Yates
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SIZEMORE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Randall Sizemore
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
DARBY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR DONALD DARBY, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Galyon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jamie Deanna Dare Galyon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Marie Becton v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
MARIE A. BECTON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Duff v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Evelyn H. Duff
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Linda Carol Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reid v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Clarence Kenny Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hancock v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Hancock
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
