Cases 71 - 80 of 37,650
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Byers v. May et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byers
Defendant:
Brendan May, John Does and Augusta, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rejistre v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rejistre
Defendant:
Adam Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. Thompson, et al
as 6:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Leticia Roberts
Defendant:
Tony Thompson and Black Hawk County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Seelig v. Ramsey County, Minnesota et al
as 0:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Seelig
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Minnesota, Inmate Services Corporation, Rogeric Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adkins v. Skivers et al
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robert Joshua Adkins
Defendant:
Officer Jason Skivers, City of Sugar Creek, Officer Ethan Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dicks v. The City of Omaha et al
as 8:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
WAYNE DICKS
Defendant:
City of Omaha, David Kirk, Mandee Kampbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
