Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 42,819
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Akeem Mason v. Robin Wallace
as 24-6423
Plaintiff:
AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant:
ROBIN WALLACE, Lieutenant, Shift Commander, JOSEPH G. CARR, Lieutenant, Training Shift Commander and CAPTAIN LUCY, Supervisor
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Lewis and CO II Lorke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
Taquan L. Brown
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The, Fourteenth Circuit Solicitor's Office, Isaac McDuffie Stone, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Smith v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Superintendent Clay Corbin, Captain H. Custer, A. Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman Monzon v. Sherrie Hatch
as 24-6412
Plaintiff:
ROMAN SEBASTIAN MONZON
Defendant:
SHERRIE HATCH, KAY GARVEY, CARRIE TAYLOR and others
Thomas v. Turay et al
as 1:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Thomas
Defendant:
CO II Turay, Sgt. CO III Michael Adelowo, CO II Bayero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
