Cases 61 - 70 of 5,228
TyJuan Keith v. USA, et al
as 23-2430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYJUAN DE-ANDRE KEITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, JOE BIDEN and others
Kamara v. Obama et al
as 2:2023cv04468
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
44 U.S. President Barrack Obama, 46 U.S. President Joseph Biden and Democrat Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Furst v. Obama
as 23-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Barack Obama, President
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JEFF SESSIONS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Defendant:
Band Bank Ltd, SQUATTER, PETER NEWSHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sinja v. Friederich et al
as 1:2023cv05948
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sinja
Defendant:
Nkosi B. Friederich and Barack Muscim Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sorezo v. Harris et al
as 2:2023cv12098
Plaintiff:
Garrett Sorezo
Defendant:
Karmala Harris and Barrack Obama
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Snead v. "Biden" "Obama" "Trump"
as 7:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
President "Biden" "Obama" "Trump"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snead v. First Kid Malia & Sasha Obama, et al
as 7:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
First Kid Malia & Sasha Obama and United Stats of Amarica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv02872
Plaintiff:
Wendell Roy Mitchell
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Penny Kemp, Greg Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
