Cases 51 - 60 of 810,862
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MERCADO v. CENTERSTONE RECOVERY CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Defendant:
Centerstone Recovery Center and Cassie Molitor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRABARCZYK et al v. TOWN OF EDINBURGH, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
JASON GRABARCZYK and ANNETTE YOUNG
Defendant:
TOWN OF EDINBURGH, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
