Cases 1 - 10 of 341
CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al v. M/T MARAN ORPHEUS et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P.
Defendant:
M/T MARAN ORPHEUS, Rony Shipping LTD and Maran Tankers Management, Inc.
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Ted Smith, Robert Hambleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2024mc00490
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Daniel Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Loyd, Jr. v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Defendant:
Sabic Innovative Plastics US, LLC, Trammo, Inc, Rain CII Carbon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William L. Loyd, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Citgo Petroleum Corporation v. Ascot Underwriting Limited, for and on behalf of Lloyd's Syndicate 1414
as 24-227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
ASCOT UNDERWRITING LIMITED, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 1414, PIONEER UNDERWRITING LIMITED, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SYNDICATE 9146, MS AMLIN UNDERWRITING LIMITED, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2001 and others
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant:
Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
State of Rhode Island v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Shell Petroleum, Inc., Valero Refining-Texas, L.P., CITGO Refining and Chemicals Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Wilson v. Citgo Petroleum Corp
as 2:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Moesha Wilson
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation and Citgo Petroleum Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
