Eleventh Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,136,355
Sproles v. Oliver We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00075
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matz v. Vanleigh RV Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff: Leonard H Matz, Jr.
Defendant: Vanleigh RV Inc, Lippert Components, Inc. and Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff: Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff: Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant: Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Margaret Williams
Defendant: State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HILL et al v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Juanita Hill and Tyson Hill
Defendant: American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
RASHADA v. HATHCOCK et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: JADEN RASHADA
Defendant: HUGH HATHCOCK, WILLIAM NAPIER, MARCUS CASTRO-WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: AMOS WALKER
Defendant: PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?