Fourth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 279
Taylor v. Janet
as 1:2013cv01657
Plaintiff:
Nathan Taylor
Defendant:
Blunt Janet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lafevers v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 6:2013cv01460
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lafevers
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Koger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv12030
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Koger
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101 Federal Railroad Safety Act
ROGERS v. U.S. CORP.
as 1:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
HOWARD S. ROGERS
Defendant:
U.S. CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
O'Connor v. Daum
as 1:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
John O'Connor
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore et al v. Southern Railway Company
as 7:1986dv00770
Plaintiff:
Roy M Moore and Marcus Roy Moore
Defendant:
Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hadden v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 3:2013cv00180
Plaintiff:
Doris Hadden
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hadden v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Doris Hadden
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Rya Zobel
as 12-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
RYA W. ZOBEL, Judge, Individual and Official Capacities, LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge, in Official Capacity, TWO UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, in Official Capacity and others
Harry Williams v. US
as 12-2460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY JAMAL WILLIAMS, Proper Party Plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
