Seventh Circuit Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 474,665
Boronbaeva v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03591
Plaintiff:
Gulnaz Boronbaeva
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kevin Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
. Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez et al v. Dakich et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ph.D. Dr. Linda Lopez and Impact Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dakich, Ryan D. Lafler, Greater South Shore Technology Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campos v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
