Eighth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 178
Johannes v. Schroder
as 4:2010cv04027
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johannes
Defendant:
Pat Schroder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Danial Ray Curtis v. U.S. Judiciary, et al
as 10-1488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danial Ray Curtis
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Judiciary, District of North Dakota Judiciary, 07K-0455, City of Fargo and others
McGruder et al v. Beebe et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Julious McGruder, Loretta Jarrett, Calvin Holden and others
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Arkansas Supreme Court, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
James Germalic v. John Gale
as 09-3752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Germalic, Independent Candidate for President, Pro Se
Defendant - Appellee:
John Gale, Secretary of State Lincoln, Nebraska
Green Party of Arkansas et al v. Daniels
as 4:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Green Party of Arkansas, Mark Swaney and Rebekah Kennedy
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Beecham v. Kansas City Police Department
as 4:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tawana M Beecham
Defendant:
Kansas City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Curtis v. U.S. Judiciary et al
as 3:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Danial Ray Curtis
Defendant:
U.S. Judiciary, District of North Dakota Judiciary, Fargo, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Janis et al v. Nelson et al
as 5:2009cv05019
Plaintiff:
Eileen Janis and Kim Colhoff
Defendant:
Chris Nelson, Paula Jones, Gail Brock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day et al v. Robinwood West Community Improvement District
as 4:2008cv01888
Plaintiff:
Noel A. Day, Aimee N. Pavey, James M. Strake and others
Defendant:
Robinwood West Community Improvement District
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
