Eighth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 619
Jones v. Real Estate Equities
as 0:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Monty Jones
Defendant:
Real Estate Equities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steiner v. MRS Holdings et al
as 0:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Valerie Steiner
Defendant:
MRS Holdings, Mark Kelash and Sam Kelash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Olderbak Georgetown/Willows LLC
as 8:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michelle Stone
Defendant:
Olderbak Georgetown/Willows LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Harmon et al
as 0:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Johnson
Defendant:
Jarett Harmon and Elbrus Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Berg v. BBH Management Company, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Berg
Defendant:
BBH Management Company, LLC and Hartman-Greenbrier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Modicue v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Bruce Modicue
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Charles v. Real Property Groups
as 2:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Charles
Defendant:
Real Property Groups
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
McCoy v. Greg Nichols Properties Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04184
Plaintiff:
Leila McCoy
Defendant:
Greg Nichols Properties Inc. and Tyler Rambis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cruz-McCoy et al v. Greg Nichols Properties Inc.
as 2:2022cv04180
Plaintiff:
Leila Cruz-McCoy and Clyde McCoy
Defendant:
Greg Nichols Properties Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Meadows v. North American Savings Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Diane Meadows
Defendant:
North American Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
