US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 111 - 120 of 46,831
Al-Barr v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00162
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Plaintiff:
Lord Judah Al-Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Langley v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Galan Edward Langley
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humbert v. Castleberry
as 4:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Humbert
Defendant:
Sharron Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatmon v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00737
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, Dexter Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Rolandis Chatmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapin v. Central Arkansas House Buyers LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00733
Defendant:
Matt Lamb, Central Arkansas House Buyers LLC and CAHB Operating LLC
Plaintiff:
Kristen Chapin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Rutherford Obama v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00732
Defendant:
Burnett, Dexter Payne, C Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Kandi Robert Steven Rutherford Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Thomas et al
as 4:2024cv00731
Defendant:
Seth Thomas and Mike Patel
Plaintiff:
Robert T Allen, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
White v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
David Shaun White
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
