Contract Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 12,040
Manjal Investments Inc. v. Lovren Advisors LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Manjal Investments Inc.
Defendant:
Lovren Advisors LLC and Appalakutty Satish
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
RBVETCO, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
RBVETCO, LLC doing business as ROCKY BLEIER CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HEALTHREV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
HEALTHREV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
ANSIBLE GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Marfoe v. Discover Financial Services LLC
as 1:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marfoe
Defendant:
Discover Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Watson v. Financial Center First Credit Union
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Ernest Watson
Defendant:
Financial Center First Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrument
Naples v. Truist Bank
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ann Naples
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
TD Bank, N.A. v. Charlie Black Car Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Charlie Black Car Inc., Charles H. Bai and Christopher J. Kim
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
IZES v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. IZES
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and CENLAR FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SAFAL PARTNERS LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
SAFAL PARTNERS LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRUIST BANK v. ELGEO CORP et al
as 2:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Elgeo Corp, David Alhalabi and Irakli Sharashenidze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
