Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 28,839
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Bryant v. Texas City ISD
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
Texas City ISD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams v. UPS, Inc., et al
as 2:2024at00522
Plaintiff:
Trina Williams
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Andrew Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Minton v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Eric Minton
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Moore v. Foxtrot Retail, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
Jamil Ladell Moore
Defendant:
Foxtrot Retail, Inc., Outfox Hospitality LLC and Dom's Market LLC
Bridget Sibyl Quintero v. Prime Now LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Bridget Sibyl Quintero
Defendant:
Prime Now LLC, Amazon.Com LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Joshua Porter et al v. Northern Data US, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03389
Plaintiff:
Joshua Porter and Gulsen Kama
Defendant:
Northern Data US, Inc. and Northern Data US Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vega v. Amurcon Realty Company et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Frank Vega
Defendant:
Amurcon Realty Company, Micheal Barnes, Rebecca Cannady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PS) Smith v. Home Depot
as 2:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Smith v. Home Depot
as 2:2024at00516
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
