Cases 151 - 160 of 195
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. et al v. AHMED et al
as 2:2009cv03942
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
HUSSAIN B. PATHAN, TUFAIL AHMED and HPTA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Husen v. Doctors Associates, Inc.
as 2:2009cv13023
Plaintiff:
Dielli Husen
Defendant:
Doctors Associates, Inc. and Doctors Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Dangtran v. Doctors Associates Inc.
as 2:2009cv01395
Plaintiff:
Joe Dangtran
Defendant:
Doctors Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
v. Doctors Associates Inc. et al
as 2:2009at00793
Defendant:
Doctors Associates Inc. and Joe Dangtran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dangtran v. Doctors Associates Inc.
as 2:2009at00790
Defendant:
Doctors Associates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Dangtran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC. v. PATEL
as 3:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
ADITI B. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Krashnak
as 3:2009cv00386
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Asa Krashnak
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Goman et al
as 2:2009cv00491
Plaintiff:
Delbert Williams
Defendant:
Goman, Chief Medical Officer, California Doctor Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardway v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv00410
Plaintiff:
Lena Hardway
Defendant:
Doctor's Associates, Inc., Subway Real Estate, Frederick De Luca and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Sharma
as 1:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Dharminder Sharma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
