Cases 91 - 100 of 4,570
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Donald Otis Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6123
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Johnny Johnson v. David Vandergriff
as 23-2664
Petitioner / Appellant:
Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
David Vandergriff, Warden
In re: Elizabeth Peiffer
as 23-5
Appellant:
In re: ELIZABETH JANE PEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ANTHONY RUNYON
Amicus Curiae:
JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY, Esq. and PROFESSOR JAMES E. MOLITERNO
(DP) Vieira v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Richard John Vieira
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Ellis v Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Roy L. Ellis
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Vasquez v. Collier
as 2:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Richard Vasquez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Milton Taylor v. Commissioner Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-2160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILTON TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Hall v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
