Cases 31 - 40 of 582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Espinoza v. Seva Companies LLC Wrigleyville
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Maricela Espinoza
Defendant:
Seva Companies LLC Wrigleyville doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Minda's Donuts, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC and DD IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Minda's Donuts, Inc. and Arminda R. Daviduk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
ISBELL v. ZIONSVILLE DONUTS, INC. D/B/A DUNKIN DONUTS
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ISBELL, as natural mother and next friend of MIKALEN ISBELL and MELISSA ISBELL
Defendant:
ZIONSVILLE DONUTS, INC. D/B/A DUNKIN DONUTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Dine Brands Global, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Consolidated Defendant:
Dine Brands Global, Inc., ALBERTSONS, LLC, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
