Cases 1 - 10 of 562
Berland v. X Corp., Successor in Interest to Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv07589
Defendant:
Brian Bjelde, Dhruv Batura, Elon Musk and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Berland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Laura Loomer v. Cair Florida, Inc., et al
as 24-13324
Defendant:
CAIR FLORIDA, INC., CRAIG WILLIAM YOUNG, CAIR FOUNDATION and others
Plaintiff:
LAURA LOOMER
Thomas v. Apple, et al. et al
as 1:2024cv07463
Defendant:
DJ Khalid, Google, et al., Young Thug and others
Plaintiff:
Caze D. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anoke, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., et al.
as 24-5936
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MOISES ORTIZ GOMEZ, ISABELLE CANNELL, MELANIE EUSEBIO and others
Defendant:
X HOLDINGS I, INC., X CORP., TWITTER, INC. and others
Intervenor:
JACOB SILVERMAN
Cofield et al v. LinkedIn Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Chere Nedd, Arviette Cofield, Orian Cofield and others
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Ally Financial LLC, United States Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brown v. Google et al
as 1:2024cv07018
Defendant:
YouTube, Facebook, Lulu.com and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Leslie Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Personette et al v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv06266
Plaintiff:
Dalana Brand, James Sullivan and Sarah Personette
Defendant:
Elon Musk, X CORP., Twitter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
James-Irvin et al v. Muslims of America et al
as 3:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Def Jam, BIA, Lamont Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.O.M., Keita M James-Irvin and W.W.M., Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sean Bishop v. Twitter
as 24-1787
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. BISHOP, a/k/a #MooninthedayTV, a/k/a #BloodandBananaspro, a/k/a #Blackspaghettifilms
Defendant:
TWITTER, INCORPORATED, and owned by Twitter hashtag
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
