Cases 161 - 170 of 193
Don Smith v. Michael McCarthy
as 09-6200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON W. SMITH and DONNA L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. MCCARTHY, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a Nelson County Deputy Sheriff, MALCOLM E. BRIDGWATER, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a Nelson County Deputy Sheriff, JOHN M. DIXON, II, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as a past Nelson County Deputy Sheriff and others
Todd v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00398
Plaintiff:
Robin L. Todd
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stubbs v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Shane A Stubbs
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Collins v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cindy K. Collins
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lawson v. Middle River Regional Jail Authority et al
as 5:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mae Virginia Lawson
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Middle River Regional Jail Authority, Middle River Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00273
Plaintiff:
Tracey Brown
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
REESE v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY) et al
as 2:2008cv86785
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORTON REESE
Defendant:
3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY), AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wright v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Wright
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Evans v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
Julie L. Evans
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Morton v. Watkins et al
as 3:2008cv00783
Plaintiff:
James Morton
Defendant:
Craig Watkins and Glen Gibson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
